[seqfan] Re: The Demichel errors, continued

[Olivier Gerard]

On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 00:19, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>wrote:

>
> What do people think?
>
> I was going to edit A013305 as an example, but I will wait.
>
> The question is, do we keep the rotten sequence, marked "dead",
> and create 2 new sequences,
> or replace it with the numerators and have 1 new sequence for the
> denominators?
>
>
Another solution would be to have the original version replaced by a
systematic
and checked rounding of the coefficients, with comments corrected
and the two new sequence as previously described.

Olivier