# [seqfan] Re: Your A051217 Nonnegative numbers of the form 6^x-y^2.

David Wilson davidwwilson at comcast.net
Thu Nov 17 05:38:46 CET 2011

```I ran the program for all n on the range 0 <= n <= 1152 (the %STU
range), and it confirmed that A051217 is correct on the published range.
For each n, it either solved n = 6^x - y^2 or found a modulus for which
it was insoluble. (I did not author the b-file). I have sent the results
to Moshe Levin, who originally contested the sequence.

Now I don't have to worry about going to Hell (over A051217 anyway).

Good night all.

On 11/14/2011 12:04 AM, franktaw at netscape.net wrote:
> I would most certainly take game 1. I would rate the probability that
> there is some regularity we have no inkling of that makes hitting
> particular values more likely at about 10^-4; if the probability of
> hitting a value in the published range is then, say, 10^-10, that
> still gives you a 10^-14 chance of losing - much worse than the other
> game. Even if the probability of such a regularity is 10^-20, your
> odds are much worse in game 2.
>
>
> P.S. This is of course not counting the Monty Hall effect. If the
> devil gives you that choice, you can be pretty sure that he knows
> something that you don't.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Wilson <davidwwilson at comcast.net>
> ...
>
> So, technically, yes, I could have missed a value in A051217. However,
> if I had to choose between playing
> these two games:
>
> Game 1: You and I each choose a random subatomic particle from the
> observable universe.  If we choose
> the same particle, I go to Hell.
>
> Game 2: If A051217 is missing an element on the published range, I go to
> Hell.
>
> I would play game 2.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>

```