[seqfan] Re: two sequences without explanation

Jonathan Post jvospost3 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 8 18:39:06 CET 2011


Searching for (c) yields a coincidence:
the U.S. Naval Observatory (as of May 15, 2011) predicts that UT will
be 0.28234 seconds behind UTC on June 15, 2011.
http://www.idialstars.com/jun2011.htm
and also:
The same formula as that used for the aluminium bands, viz.
TABLE VII
http://www.archive.org/stream/astrophysicaljou36ameruoft/astrophysicaljou36ameruoft_djvu.txt

On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 8:59 AM, N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com> wrote:
>
> Dear Seqfans, back in 1987 someone from
> the Astrophysical Journal sent me three sequences
> whose explanation was not known to her.
>
> One of them turns out to be a serious sequence, A007468,
> so perhaps the other two are also. Can anyone
> identify them? Neil
>
> (a) 0,9,23,30,35,49,58,73,94
> (b) (Equals A007468)
> (c) 2,8,2,3,4,9,4,5,9,8
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



More information about the SeqFan mailing list