[seqfan] easy

franktaw at netscape.net franktaw at netscape.net
Sat Oct 1 01:20:06 CEST 2011

While we're on the subject, I would like to suggest removing the "easy" 

1) Current application is very hit or miss. There are tens of thousands 
of easy sequences that do not have the keyword.
2) I don't know what it's good for. Why would anyone every search for 
"easy" (or not "easy")? Leaving aside the current searches for 
anomalies like "easy" and "more".
3) Showing that a sequence is easy is better done with a comment, 
formula, or program, so that one can see why it is easy.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

More information about the SeqFan mailing list