[seqfan] easy

[franktaw at netscape.net]

While we're on the subject, I would like to suggest removing the "easy" 
keyword.

1) Current application is very hit or miss. There are tens of thousands 
of easy sequences that do not have the keyword.
2) I don't know what it's good for. Why would anyone every search for 
"easy" (or not "easy")? Leaving aside the current searches for 
anomalies like "easy" and "more".
3) Showing that a sequence is easy is better done with a comment, 
formula, or program, so that one can see why it is easy.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters