[seqfan] Re: A159580 easy, more

[allouche at math.jussieu.fr]

Dear all

Should it not be in general better (or even compulsory!) to write
explicit definitions or formulas better than (or systematically
in addition to) programs in whatever language that people
do not necessarily know and that will certainly be obsolete
earlier than you think...?

best
jp




"N. J. A. Sloane" <njas at research.att.com> a écrit :

> Concerning A159577 and the associated sequences A159578 ... A159580 ...:
>
> As Sean observed, the terms do not match the definiton.
> The definition produces A116536, with related sequences A051838 and A196415.
>
> But A159577 contains a UBASIC program. Can someone who understands
> BASIC please read that program and explain what it does?
>
> Then we can change the definition of A159577 etc to match
> the values of the terms.
>
> Neil
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.