[seqfan] Re: A181050
Harvey P. Dale
hpd1 at nyu.edu
Sat Oct 15 23:13:02 CEST 2011
The problem is that the definition (Name) of the sequence
appears to contemplate a continued fraction whose terms are simply
consecutive odd numbers. Have I misread that?
Best,
Harvey
-----Original Message-----
From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
[mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Hans Havermann
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2011 5:09 PM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A181050
Harvey P. Dale:
> Are the terms of this sequence correct? I get a substantially
> different constant: 1.313035285 . . .
Yes. Perhaps surprisingly, the decimal digits he gives have a vague
continued-fraction pattern:
{1, 1, 1, 9, 1, 1, 17, 1, 1, 25, 1, 1, 33, 1, 1, 41, 1, 1, 49, 1, 1,
57, 1, 1, 65, 1, 1, 73,...}
_______________________________________________
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list