[seqfan] Re: Anagram sequence

[Andrew Weimholt]

On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 10:17 PM, David Wilson <davidwwilson at comcast.net> wrote:

> The sequence would be "Smallest positive integer with exactly n anagrams",
> and starts
>
> 1 12 112 102 11112 123 1111112
>

For n>1, there's also a largest integer with exactly n anagrams...

990, 9990, 99990, ... which is A124167 (excluding the first two terms),

and therefore, we can have a sequence which counts the number of
positive integers with exactly n anagrams:

beginning with a(2)...

90, 270, 504, 450, 1530, 630,  Not in OEIS

Andrew