[seqfan] Re: "see Mathematica program for definition" Was: defn A011773

[Charles Greathouse]

Absolutely.  The same goes for any language, of course.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University

On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 5:02 PM, Alonso Del Arte
<alonso.delarte at gmail.com> wrote:
> I love Mathematica, but there just is no good reason for an OEIS sequence
> entry to be "See Mathematica program for definition."
>
> Currently, there are 28 entries with "Mathematica" in the Name field. Some
> of these might have a valid reason IF we agree that there is such a thing as
> the "Mathematica order of partitions."
>
> Ignoring those leaves about five sequences where the name is something like
> "See Mathematica code for definition." I think we should change those to
> something a little more meaningful.
>
> Al
>
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:43 AM, Maximilian Hasler <
> maximilian.hasler at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Richard Mathar wrote:
>> > I'd appreciate a definition in http://oeis.org/A011773 which is more
>> precise
>> > than "Related to Carmichael's lambda function: for precise definition see
>> the Mathematica program below."
>>
>> I propose to replace the 2nd part of the name by
>>
>> a(p1^e1*...*pN^eN) = LCM((p1-1)*p1^(e1-1),...,(pN-1)*pN^(eN-1)).
>>
>> Maximilian
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Alonso del Arte
> Author at SmashWords.com<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>