[seqfan] Re: Slowest increasing sequence where a(n)-n is prime

[Charles Greathouse]

> My inclination was to delete it. I'm pretty sure the original author just
> miscomputed it, so that it should have been a duplicate of A052147.

Had it been a newer sequence I would have felt similarly, but once a
sequence hits a certain age (5?) I tend to not delete even if
deserving.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University

On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 2:28 PM,  <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
> My inclination was to delete it. I'm pretty sure the original author just
> miscomputed it, so that it should have been a duplicate of A052147.
>
> I added the "less" keyword, which certainly belongs here if it is going to
> be used anywhere.
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>
>
> I edited A107820 (in a conservative way, chaanging the definition to match
> the
> sequence).
>
> Best regards
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>