[seqfan] Re: easy and bref

[Max Alekseyev]

On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Richard Mathar
<mathar at strw.leidenuniv.nl> wrote:
>
> A sequence can be both easy and bref, in particular if the next
> terms have many more digits than the current soft limit of roughly 100
> per line, but are still easy to compute.

As I understand, this contradicts to the definition of 'bref'. If we
can compute the next term, we can do any analysis with it.
Ability to perform analysis does not depend on whether this term fits
100 characters or not.

Max