[seqfan] A070729

Harvey P. Dale hpd1 at nyu.edu
Mon Aug 13 21:12:06 CEST 2012


            Shouldn't this sequence have either a comment or an addition
to its definition to state the date as of which it is correct?  To
generalize this: whenever a sequence purports to list terms taken from
an external, non-mathematical, empirical source (e.g., price of
first-class postage stamps in the U.S. over time) shouldn't the sequence
have an as-of date shown?

            Best,

            Harvey




More information about the SeqFan mailing list