[seqfan] Re: Dropping the monotonic increase in http://oeis.org/A106003

[Neil Sloane]

I revised the definition of A106003 (after studying A106004).
Neil

On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 3:14 PM, <israel at math.ubc.ca> wrote:

> The title of A106003 does not adequately specify the sequence, in my
> opinion. If there is a requirement of monotonic increase, where is it
> mentioned? Please provide more explanation in the Comments section.
>
> Robert Israel
> University of British Columbia
>
>
> On Aug 9 2012, Eric Angelini wrote:
>
>  Hello SeqFans,
>> if we require that the next term of the sequence
>> is "the smallest integer not yet present in T" do we get this?
>>
>> T = 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,110,111,100,**112,113,114,115,101,102,116,**
>> 117,120,118,119,130,118,119,**140,210,211,150,212,103,213,**
>> 214,104,121,215,216,160,217,**218,170,...
>>
>> Is T a permutation of http://oeis.org/A001633 ?
>> Best,
>> É.
>>
>>
>> ______________________________**_________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



-- 
Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com