[seqfan] Re: First terms of OEIS sequences

[Neil Sloane]

Actually I think the second sequence IS in the OEIS. In any case,
I have no objection to adding either of them. But note
that they are time-dependent, so the definition should
include the date on which they were computed.

Neil

On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 1:32 PM, zak seidov <zakseidov at yahoo.com> wrote:

>
>
> 1
> First term of prime(n)-th sequence OEIS (Apn(1)?).
> 1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,1,2,(* first not-one term: A37*)1,2,1,14,1,1,...
>
>
> 2
> First term  of n-th sequence of OEIS, (An(1)?).
> 1,1,1,...
>
> Anyone wish to submit these(using some smart code?)?
> I vaguely remember that Neil are againt such sequences, though:(
>
> Best,
> Zak
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



-- 
Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com