[seqfan] Re: A001476
charles.greathouse at case.edu
Sat Feb 25 21:51:52 CET 2012
The question has been raised before, but I don't think there has been
a satisfactory answer. I think that (1) there should be a clear-cut
answer to this question, so people can properly interpret the keyword,
and (2) b-files which complete a sequence should have a note to that
On the whole I think it would be best to mark these sequences as full,
but only once there's consensus on that point. Otherwise we risk
people seeing the keyword and thinking that the terms displayed
complete the sequence, which would be bad.
Case Western Reserve University
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 3:37 PM, Alonso Del Arte
<alonso.delarte at gmail.com> wrote:
> Where would the line be drawn? Is there a finite sequence in the OEIS that
> is nevertheless too long to be given in full in the B-file?
> When I wrote the first draft of
> http://oeis.org/wiki/Clear-cut_examples_of_keywords I looked long and hard
> for a finite sequence with a long B-file. A056757 was the best I could
> find, with a little over fifty thousand terms total. A finite sequence with
> two or three hundred terms wouldn't have been a clear-cut example of
> keyword:fini -keyword:full.
> On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 12:22 PM, David Wilson <davidwwilson at comcast.net>wrote:
>> A001476 is an example of a finite sequence that is not complete in the STU
>> lines, but is complete in the b-file.
>> Perhaps we should mark such sequences as "full" since the data is
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> Alonso del Arte
> Author at SmashWords.com<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan