[seqfan] Re: A104128
Charles Greathouse
charles.greathouse at case.edu
Mon Feb 27 15:07:20 CET 2012
The definition matches the program and the reciprocal given but not
the terms. Probably the terms were a copy/paste error of some sort.
If we're going to go on a detective hunt for the original meaning, we
should change the name of the sequence, move the existing name to a
comment ("original name: ..."), and add keyword:unkn. Otherwise we
could just change the terms (since all the other evidence points to
those being off). It's not a big deal either way.
Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Harvey P. Dale <hpd1 at nyu.edu> wrote:
> Tony having reverted my changes to the above sequence (and I
> have no complaints about that), the sequence terms do not match the
> definition (Name) of the sequence. Shouldn't some amendment to the
> definition, or comment, be added?
>
> Best,
>
> Harvey
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list