[seqfan] Re: A051264 == A050278 ?
Giovanni Resta
g.resta at iit.cnr.it
Wed Jan 11 00:59:55 CET 2012
On 11/01/2012 0.53, Hans Havermann wrote:
> Giovanni Resta:
>
>> Since a number cannot be 9-persistent, I have set a(9)=0.
>
> Hmm. One of the first exercises in the Honsberger reference (quoted by
> Richard Guy previously in this thread) is "Prove that there exists at
> least one n-persistent number for
> each positive integer n."
>
> Are you sure you are calculating these correctly?
The problem is in the definition.
If one uses a strict definition of k-persistency (like you did in your
sequence), i.e. n is k-persistent if 1*n, 2*n, ..., k*n are
pandigital, BUT (k+1)*n IS NOT,
then it is easy to see that there cannot be 9-persistent numbers.
In fact, if n, 2*n, 3*n, ...., 9*n are all pandigital (and thus
n is a candidate to 9-persistency) then also 10*n, which is n plus a 0,
is also pandigital, hence our candidate n is at least 10-persistent.
Giovanni
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list