[seqfan] Re: A071022 etc rule cellular automaton values

Kevin Ryde user42 at zip.com.au
Thu Jan 12 21:22:53 CET 2012

Hans Havermann <gladhobo at teksavvy.com> writes:
> I've submitted corrections to A071022-A071027, A071029-A071035, and
> A071037-A071041,

Looks good.

> I didn't look hard enough. It was A071036, of course. I made the
> correction and noted: "The correction makes this sequence a duplicate
> of A118110."

Yes.  Three other possible similar duplicates

    A071030 A118109  rule 54
    A071033 A118102  rule 94
    A071037 A118172  rule 158

A071026 and A118174 are both rule 188, but I see your A071026 is just
the right half n+1 cells, whereas the latter is the whole 2n+1 row
including the 0s on the left.  Maybe if keeping both A118174 could note
its row length and the two cross reference each other.

More information about the SeqFan mailing list