[seqfan] Re: seq needed of (0,+-1) matrices
rhhardin at att.net
Thu Jan 19 22:51:19 CET 2012
No problem, the machine does the work
mine continues to term 8
1 3 27 293 3605 52327 899311 18019017
a ninth term possible but doubtful
rhhardin at mindspring.com
rhhardin at att.net (either)
----- Original Message ----
> From: N. J. A. Sloane <njas at research.att.com>
> To: seqfan at list.seqfan.eu
> Cc: rhhardin at mindspring.com; njas at research.att.com
> Sent: Thu, January 19, 2012 4:41:46 PM
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: seq needed of (0,+-1) matrices
> Robert Israel found the explanation!
> I was using
> and got a(4) = 125, agreeing with Max A.,
> but when I corrected this to
> I get a(4) = 293, agreeing with rhh.
> So it does look like we get two sequences!
> The second version is the one in Wesp's paper (although
> he does not give any numerical values)
> Robert, thanks for straightening this out!
> I will add the other version - it will be A204821 (and
> A204809 is the other version)
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan