[seqfan] Re: A071022 etc rule cellular automaton values
Kevin Ryde
user42 at zip.com.au
Thu Jan 12 21:22:53 CET 2012
Hans Havermann <gladhobo at teksavvy.com> writes:
>
> I've submitted corrections to A071022-A071027, A071029-A071035, and
> A071037-A071041,
Looks good.
> I didn't look hard enough. It was A071036, of course. I made the
> correction and noted: "The correction makes this sequence a duplicate
> of A118110."
Yes. Three other possible similar duplicates
A071030 A118109 rule 54
A071033 A118102 rule 94
A071037 A118172 rule 158
A071026 and A118174 are both rule 188, but I see your A071026 is just
the right half n+1 cells, whereas the latter is the whole 2n+1 row
including the 0s on the left. Maybe if keeping both A118174 could note
its row length and the two cross reference each other.
More information about the SeqFan
mailing list