[seqfan] Re: seq needed of (0,+-1) matrices

[N. J. A. Sloane]

uhoh - we have two different versions!

>Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 11:53:06 -0800 (PST)
>From: Ron Hardin <rhhardin at att.net>
>Subject: [seqfan] Re: seq needed of (0,+-1) matrices

>I get 1 3 27 293 3605 52327 899311
>unless I've misunderstood the formula
>(does "... (*)" mean anything?  I'm worried because it suggests a continuation)

> rhhardin at mindspring.com
>rhhardin at att.net (either)

>> From: Max Alekseyev <maxale at gmail.com>
>> Sent: Wed, January 18, 2012 4:03:09 PM
>> Subject: [seqfan] Re: seq needed of (0,+-1) matrices
>> 
>> The first 6 terms of the requested sequence are:
>> 
>> 1, 3, 27, 125, 461,  1583
>> 
>> I may also get a(7) soon.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Max
>> 

No, the (*) doesn't mean anything, it was a label
in case I wanted to refer to the condition later.

It looks like we will end up with two different sequences
once this has been straightened out.

Neil