[seqfan] Re: A historical sequence pertaining to Fermat's last theorem

[Charles Greathouse]

I think all small numbers had been ruled out, at least through 4 million.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University

On Thu, Jul 19, 2012 at 1:08 AM, Alonso Del Arte
<alonso.delarte at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is already in the OEIS, because I'm not quite sure how
> to ascertain the terms and because I suspect that if it was proposed at one
> point, it ran into some objections:
>
> Just prior to the Wiles proof of Fermat's conjecture, which n were not
> ruled out from solutions to x^n + y^n = z^n ? The only numbers I can think
> of that don't belong to this sequence are the Sophie Germain primes, and 4.
>
> Al
>
> --
> Alonso del Arte
> Author at SmashWords.com<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/