[seqfan] Keyword modifiers

[franktaw at netscape.net]

Those are, ab initio, reasonable suggestions for syntax. Buy the 
parentheses notation is already, as I understand it, in train for tabf; 
we should be consistent. And parentheses are the most flexible; the 
modifiers can be separated by commas and/or nested.

Is it also planned to enable frac(Axxxxxx) to point to the denominator 
or numerator sequence? And then click on it to show the fractions?

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Charles Greathouse <charles.greathouse at case.edu>

Yes, it would be nice to be able to search for these things by
keyword. I've toyed with the idea of mimicking the CSS |= selector by
writing

fini-conj (or even fini-?)

which allows additional levels to be added if needed.

This doesn't obviate the need for comments, but allows for much easier
searching.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University

On Wed, Jul 25, 2012 at 9:34 AM,  <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
> If we're going to have modified keywords, how about a "conj" modifier 
to
> indicate a conjectured keyword? Then these would be 
"fini(conj),full(conj)".
> This modifier would also apply to the "mult" keyword.
>
> It would be nice to also have a way to show that the infiniteness of a
> sequence is conjectured.
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Georgi Guninski <guninski at guninski.com>
>
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 01:42:51PM +0400, Max Alekseyev wrote:
>>
>> I suspect that finiteness of A027687 is not proved but "extremly
>> probable" as stated at Achim Flammenkamp's page:
>> http://wwwhomes.uni-bielefeld.de/achim/mpn.html
>> (notice the difference between answers "yes and proved" and simply
>> "yes" in the column "Are all discovered?").
>>
>> The flag 'fini' is thus inappropriate.
>
>
> May be these should not be "fini" too:
>
> A046060                 5-multiperfect numbers.
> A046061                 6-multiperfect numbers.