[seqfan] Re: Bad sequences for passwords

[Chris Starling]

Humor: It just seems like it.

On Sun, Mar 25, 2012 at 12:09 PM, Harvey P. Dale <hpd1 at nyu.edu> wrote:

>            I think it is actually unlikely that "human beings have by
> now generated most of infinity." J
>
>
>
>                Best,
>
>            Harvey
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
> [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Chris Starling
> Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2012 10:31 AM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: Bad sequences for passwords
>
>
>
> But at what point does the quantity of data generated on the internet so
> far outweigh the as yet ungenerated data?  When there are more
> possibilities, it is a better place to hide.  Surely, humans have by now
> generated most of infinity.
>
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 12:24 PM, Russ Cox <rsc at swtch.com
> <mailto:rsc at swtch.com> > wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 10:16 AM, Alonso Del Arte
>
> > <alonso.delarte at gmail.com <mailto:alonso.delarte at gmail.com> > wrote:
>
> > > What would be some other bad sequences to use for passwords?
>
> >
>
> > Anything you post on a mailing list, probably.  :-)
>
> >
>
> > Russ
>
> >
>
> > _______________________________________________
>
> >
>
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/ <http://list.seqfan.eu/>
>
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/ <http://list.seqfan.eu/>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>