[seqfan] Re: A069687 and A185022

Reinhard Zumkeller reinhard.zumkeller at gmail.com
Fri May 18 20:45:27 CEST 2012


but:
A185022(50) =1889 = A069687(49)
A069687(50) = 1913.



2012/5/18 Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
>
> Harvey, You are right!
> They should be merged into A069687 and then A185022 should
> be recycled - can you take care of it?
> Thanks for noticing this duplication!
> Neil
>
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Harvey P. Dale <hpd1 at nyu.edu> wrote:
>
> >        It appears that these two sequences are identical.  If so,
> > probably one should be removed?  I have just added a Mma program and a
> > b-file to the latter, so if the latter is to be removed those should
> > probably be transferred to the former.
> >
> >        Best,
> >        Harvey
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/



More information about the SeqFan mailing list