[seqfan] Re: A069687 and A185022

[Harvey P. Dale]

	Alois confirms that the terms of A185022 are correct.  Neil has
requested of me that A185022 "should be merged into A069687 and then
A185022 should be recycled - can you take care of it?"  But I have never
done either a merger or a recycling and I'm not sure how to do either.
In order to protect the integrity of the OEIS, perhaps someone else
should undertake both the merger and the recycling?  I'll then be happy,
if it's necessary, to provide the Mma program, the b-file, and any
desired additional terms of the sequence.

	Best,

	Harvey
 

-----Original Message-----
From: seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu
[mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Heinz, Alois
Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 3:59 PM
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A069687 and A185022


A069687 has an error: 509 is missing.
A185022 is correct.

Alois

Am 18.05.2012 20:45, schrieb Reinhard Zumkeller:
> but:
> A185022(50) =1889 = A069687(49)
> A069687(50) = 1913.
>
>
>
> 2012/5/18 Neil Sloane<njasloane at gmail.com>
>> Harvey, You are right!
>> They should be merged into A069687 and then A185022 should be 
>> recycled - can you take care of it?
>> Thanks for noticing this duplication!
>> Neil

_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/