[seqfan] Re: Excessive b-file, perhaps?

Neil Sloane njasloane at gmail.com
Thu Nov 15 03:15:20 CET 2012

I think 200K terms are ok for that sequence. It is interesting
enough to justify them. In fact I probably asked Hugo to
supply them. The b-file downloads instantly for me.

There has been too much carping about b-files recently. For
basic sequences or others of great interest there is no reason not to have
larger b-files than 10K terms.


On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:06 PM, David Wilson <davidwwilson at comcast.net>wrote:

> Perhaps A000959 has an unduly large b-file (200K terms).  It bogs the
> graph, and even downloading the b-file is noticeably slower than
> instantaneous.
> I don't mind having the file around, but aren't 10K terms sufficient for a
> b-file?
> ______________________________**_________________
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com

More information about the SeqFan mailing list