[seqfan] A129645 and A129646

[franktaw at netscape.net]

 https://oeis.org/search?q=id%3AA129645|id%3AA129646&sort=&language=&go=Search

It appears to me that the latter terms of these two sequences are wrong. Through 25, the divisors of terms from A129645 appear in A129646 in increasing order. The next two are in decreasing order, and the final one, 184, is in apparently random order.

In the absence of any indication to the contrary, I would assume that they are all supposed to be in increasing order. Do people agree with this fix? I know we don't usually change the existing terms of a sequence this old, but I think this is an exception.

 

Franklin T. Adams-Watters