[seqfan] Re: Withdrawing my "low quality" submitted sequences

[Alonso Del Arte]

Raman,

The OEIS is a scientific reference, NOT a vanity publisher. There are
companies that will print almost anything you want in hundreds of books
provided you pay them. You can also get your own website and publish
whatever you want on it. If you think the OEIS has stringent review
standards, try submitting a paper to a renowned math journal like the
*Fibonacci
Quarterly*.

I am not the OEIS Treasurer, but I imagine that the OEIS Foundation would
accept donations of any amount. But as a bribe to give you special
treatment over the other contributors, $20 is an insult. Even if I had the
authority to unblock you, I would not want to. Come up with a couple of
trillion and we'll talk.

Al

On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 3:04 AM, Raman <raman22feb1988 at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear Sir,
>
> It has been three months and I think it is enough.
>
> I withdrew sequences first, because that was solution I got after praying
> to our local deity, what has to be done to establish good contacts with
> editors. Well, I apologize.
>
> May I suggest you unblock me? There is no point in postponing my
> submissions.
>
> Before unblocking, let me know if I can pay editors for their editing work,
> so that they will be less restrictive with submission limits. I will make
> arrangements with my father to pay you if you are interested.
>
> Let me know if you are interested in accepting money. What does $20 mean to
> you?
>
> On 6 Aug 2013 07:08, "Neil Sloane" <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Raman,
> > The OEIS policy is that once a sequence is in the OEIS,
> > it stays there.
> >
> > We are like a very serious scientific journal in that regard
> > (and not like facebook or other web sites).
> >
> > Neil Sloane
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 2:41 PM, Raman <raman22feb1988 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Dear Editors,
> >>
> >> It has been three months since I last contributed.
> >>
> >> In my humble opinion, it is a good thing to weed old "low quality"
> submitted sequences periodically, especially those without much of
> information, or those submitted quickly, such that my overall quality of my
> contributions in search results will rise, making the editors friendlier.
> >>
> >> I don't think it is a good reason to block me because I deleted them.
> Please reconsider your decision.
> >>
> >> I assure you that I did pray in a local temple what had to be done to
> establish good contact with OEIS editors, long back ago when I was worried,
> I got as a solution on to withdraw them, before submitting anything newly.
> >>
> >> I didn't do it with anger with anybody or something. Please show due
> respect towards me.
> >>
> >> The following were the thirty-four submitted "marginal" sequences that I
> thought I would withdraw other day.
> >>
> >> A216518, A216519, A216529, A216531, A216533, A216535-A216538,
> A216549-A216555, A216558-A216567, A216569-A216576.
> >>
> >> Sincerely,
> >> V. Raman
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:
> >
> > Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
> > 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA
> > Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> > Email: njasloane at gmail.com
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



-- 
Alonso del Arte
Author at SmashWords.com<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>