[seqfan] Re: Can more of these terms be found?

[Allan Wechsler]

A good clarification in the comments addresses my concern just fine.


On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Hans Havermann <gladhobo at teksavvy.com>wrote:

> I agree that "split" suggests a certain ambiguity, though not perhaps an
> overriding one. The word "separated" might possibly be in a similar boat.
> How about "deconcatenated"? A more mathematical description could be added
> as a comment.
>
> On Aug 10, 2013, at 4:41 PM, Allan Wechsler <acwacw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > "Numbers whose decimal form can be split into two parts, the square of
> > whose difference is the original number." Is that too long? My concern is
> > the ambiguity of the phrase, "split into two parts".
> >
> > Or ... "Numbers of the form K 10^n + L, L<10^n, that are equal to
> (K-L)^2."
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>