[seqfan] Re: A129645 and A129646

Neil Sloane njasloane at gmail.com
Sat Aug 24 08:41:35 CEST 2013


In this case I agree that the sequences should be corrected
if they are wrong. Maybe someone had assumed that
the computer program they were using would return
the divisors of a number in increasing order, which in
fact is not always the case
Neil Sloane


On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 7:26 PM, <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:

>
>
> https://oeis.org/search?q=id%3AA129645|id%3AA129646&sort=&language=&go=Search
>
> It appears to me that the latter terms of these two sequences are wrong.
> Through 25, the divisors of terms from A129645 appear in A129646 in
> increasing order. The next two are in decreasing order, and the final one,
> 184, is in apparently random order.
>
> In the absence of any indication to the contrary, I would assume that they
> are all supposed to be in increasing order. Do people agree with this fix?
> I know we don't usually change the existing terms of a sequence this old,
> but I think this is an exception.
>
>
>
> Franklin T. Adams-Watters
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



-- 
Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com



More information about the SeqFan mailing list