[seqfan] Re: Fibonaccit

Maximilian Hasler maximilian.hasler at gmail.com
Sat Feb 16 20:49:23 CET 2013


FYI, this is now https://oeis.org/draft/A214365
(probably soon http://oeis.org/A214365).
Any comments & contributions are welcome.
I linked to the OEIS thread so a link to the "eighteen.png" is
available through that, but I encourage Hans to add it explicitly if
he wishes to do so.

Maximilian


On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:02 PM, Lars Blomberg <lars.blomberg at visit.se> wrote:
> Hello Hans,
>
> Neither am I a mathematician, but I agree with your reasoning.
> (It so happens that I made my calculation and decided to publish it before I
> had read your mail).
>
> -----Ursprungligt meddelande----- From: Hans Havermann
> Sent: Saturday, February 16, 2013 5:53 PM
>
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: Fibonaccit
>
>
> Lars Blomberg:
>
>> I have found no loop within the first 10^8 terms.
>
>
> Hey Lars. :)
>
> As a non-mathematician I can't quite formalize a proof, but consider those
> consecutive 18s mentioned in my previous post. A stretch of k 18s will
> generate roughly 2k 9s in the corresponding summed-digits list, which in
> turn generate 2k 18s. Thus the number of consecutive 18s will grow without
> limit and no loops are possible.
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/


More information about the SeqFan mailing list