[seqfan] Re: A037168: a simpler definition?

Alonso Del Arte alonso.delarte at gmail.com
Sun Jun 30 16:09:08 CEST 2013


Thank you very much for clarifying that, Max. I knew this sequence was
already in the OEIS, even if a little opaque.

Al

On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 6:38 PM, Maximilian Hasler <
maximilian.hasler at gmail.com> wrote:

> I agree and made the change + explanation (proposed for review).
>
> Maximilian
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 29, 2013 at 5:43 PM, Alonso Del Arte
> <alonso.delarte at gmail.com> wrote:
> > Isn't A037168 just 2p(n) - 2 or 2(p(n) - 1) ? (In which case it's missing
> > an initial 2?)
> >
> > Al
> >
> > --
> > Alonso del Arte
> > Author at SmashWords.com<
> https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> > Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



-- 
Alonso del Arte
Author at SmashWords.com<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>


More information about the SeqFan mailing list