[seqfan] Re: The family atomics...
yahganlang at gmail.com
Sun May 12 16:56:33 CEST 2013
No worries, I've had worse. Ideology, psychology, breadth/depth issues
always raise their heads when I tell folks this stuff. Even the word
numerological is enough to send some running for the exits. To be clear my
own interests are entirely systems oriented- no 'sacred geometry' nonsense.
And while I'm also extremely curious as to the linkages between processes
that produce sequences at different hierarchical levels, and the processes
themselves of course, I'm happy to talk about them individually as
specimens and their properties. Fair enough?
On Sun, May 12, 2013 at 6:45 AM, Reinhard Zumkeller <
reinhard.zumkeller at gmail.com> wrote:
> this reply is not too long, but rather too short.
> An initial "Welcome to the OEIS" would have been nicer, I think.
> 2013/5/12 Hans Havermann <gladhobo at teksavvy.com>
> > Jess Tauber: "I just joined and wanted to give you a short(ish) intro to
> > my work on sequences in atomic systems."
> > Much too long. Mostly, we deal with well-defined sequences, not
> > philosophical/numerological bents/vents.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan