[seqfan] Re: Hofstadter's A005228, differences=complement

Allan Wechsler acwacw at gmail.com
Sun May 19 17:27:46 CEST 2013


Ah, yes, that quadratic shape is much more what I expected to see!




On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 11:17 AM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:

> Alan, thanks for telling me. In fact both b-files (A005228 and A030124)
> were wrong, and I have now corrected them.
>
> Right now I don't even know a proof that A030124(n) is
> asymptotic to n, although this should not be too difficult.
> I still don't have any rigorous bounds for either sequence.
>
> Neil
>
>
> On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 9:33 AM, Allan Wechsler <acwacw at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I don't have an answer to the question, but the graph at A005228 looks
> > wrong. It looks like the graph for A030124 instead.
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Has anyone seen any rigorous bounds on A005228(n)
> > > or A030124(n)?
> > > Neil
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > >
> > > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> > >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



More information about the SeqFan mailing list