[seqfan] Re: 1.08366
acwacw at gmail.com
Sat Nov 2 18:30:32 CET 2013
Should the sequence be marked "finite", since there is no way that further
research could yield another term?
On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 1:10 PM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:
> Certainly! Incidentally, it is not mentioned in the index
> to Finch's Mathematical Constants. Please submit it.
> On Sat, Nov 2, 2013 at 12:48 PM, Alonso Del Arte
> <alonso.delarte at gmail.com>wrote:
> > Should 1.08366, sometimes called Legendre's constant, have its own entry
> > the OEIS?
> > Al
> > --
> > Alonso del Arte
> > Author at SmashWords.com<
> > https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> > Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan