We don't even know (at least this is the view < http://www.mathpages.com/home/kmath032.htm > of Kevin Brown) "how Legendre arrived at the precise value 1.08366." On Nov 2, 2013, at 1:30 PM, Allan Wechsler <acwacw at gmail.com> wrote: > Should the sequence be marked "finite", since there is no way that further > research could yield another term?