[seqfan] Re: Atomic weights news

Charles Greathouse charles.greathouse at case.edu
Thu Oct 10 21:04:51 CEST 2013

Not to A007656, since that sequence looks at the mass of the most-common
stable element (or longest-lived, if none are stable) while the article
discusses the weighted average mass over all known forms.

I'm not sure if others need adjustment or not. It looks like the effects
are pretty small overall -- the largest change I noticed scanning the list
was 0.01 amu.

Charles Greathouse
Case Western Reserve University

On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:43 PM, Alonso Del Arte
<alonso.delarte at gmail.com>wrote:

> http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/09/25/atomic-weights-gold-elements_n_3988508.html
> Do we need to make any adjustments in the OEIS, e.g.,
> A007656<http://oeis.org/A007656>
> ?
> Al
> --
> Alonso del Arte
> Author at SmashWords.com<
> https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
> Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>
> _______________________________________________
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

More information about the SeqFan mailing list