[seqfan] Re: slowest-growing "accelerating" sequence

[Jon Wild]

On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Jon Wild wrote:

> By the way I also have the corresponding sequence using exponentiation 
> instead of multiplication/division between successive terms--I'll submit 
> that one too. Of course it grows even more quickly.

Actually, Don are you able to provide some additional terms again? I make 
the beginning of the exponential/logarithmic version as follows (it has to 
start with 2 for obvious reasons):

2, 3, 6, 21, 244, 54335, 89261547898 ...

--Jon