[seqfan] Re: Sequences do not die

[T. D. Noe]

There is no need to extend this nomenclature to sequences.  Sequences do
not die.

Tony

At 3:53 PM -0400 4/18/14, Neil Sloane wrote:
>Tony Noe said:
>"Rabbits die, but not sequences.  Sequences end.  Sequences become
>undefined... Let's be mathematical."
>
>Me: I strongly disagree. The terms "birth" and "death" have
>always been used in mathematics. (E.g. in game theory, number theory, etc.)
>
>I see that Tony's comment has already resulted in
>some changes to OEIS entries. I will attempt to undo those changes.
>
>Neil Sloane
>
>
>
>
>On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 3:05 PM, T. D. Noe <noe at sspectra.com> wrote:
>
>> Rabbits die, but not sequences.  Sequences end.  Sequences become
>> undefined...
>>
>> Let's be mathematical.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Tony
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>
>
>
>--
>Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:
>
>Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
>11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
>Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
>Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
>Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
>_______________________________________________
>
>Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/