[seqfan] Re: Sequences related to Fibonacci representations

[Olivier Gerard]

Dear Eric,

Thanks for this work.

You write:

>
> 2. Many of the sequences listed in the table are not in OEIS, and I have
> been trying to decide whether they should be added. The listed sequences
> don't seem all that interesting, to me at least, and most of them are just
> complements of each other. On the other hand, they are explicitly tabulated
> in the paper. I don't know what the original rationale was for including
> some but not all of the sequences. Any advice on this would be appreciated.
>
>
As a rule, if they are explicitly listed in the paper (Carlitz is a very
important source for
integer sequences) they should be in the OEIS.
Maybe there was no rationale as to which ones were included.

I will see if I can find what is the matter with A001651 and A003253.

Olivier