[seqfan] Re: Look and say -- my parity

[Frank Adams-Watters]

How about in different bases? In base 2, we can start with 111 (7). Can 
this continue? I don't see how off hand, though I haven't really tried 
very hard.

Perhaps we can get a sequence of how far such a sequence can be 
extended in each base.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Hans Havermann <gladhobo at teksavvy.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Wed, Aug 20, 2014 7:38 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Look and say -- my parity


Yes, the denouement was abrupt. Thank you, David! I have a single count 
of
(102853,99095) at #17187. To put it back into Eric's domain, we have a
17187-term sequence: 22 .. 1028531990952 or 22 .. 9909521028531 with 
lots of
in-between variations. Perhaps if we settle on the smallest possible 
term (that
realizes the full 17187-term sequence) at each location where more than 
one
value is possible, we have a well defined sequence. I don't think I'm 
up to
calculating it.

On Aug 20, 2014, at 7:26 PM, David Applegate <david at research.att.com> 
wrote:

> for my version it terminated with no values at step 17188


_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/