[seqfan] Re: An idea of sequences connected with OEIS

[Vladimir Shevelev]

I thank Andrew, Michael and Alonso for attention to the idea and 
several thoughts. Allow me to do some remarks.
1) Michael, by the definition, already A000004 makes
all terms of the proposed sequences  >=1;
2) Al, my idea is very far from ideas of A053873 and A053169;
3) Michael, I hope that quite unique cases of approved but wrong sequences (which are "subjects to change" of their terms) are not an obstacle for study OEIS in whole. In very extreme case, if such a correction will influence on the corresponding term of a proposed sequence Y (it is very  easy to verify), one can add 1 to the corresponding term of Y( or to close a gap
of length 1)
4) A similar possible situation (which noted by Andrew) we have when there will be found a new term of a difficult sequence which ( in addition!!) will  influence on a term of Y. The only difference is that we shall add 1 with a great joy!
 In other words, the proposed sequences will be depended on the time much less
than all special sequences in OEIS described in 3)-4) together.

Best regards,
Vladimir


________________________________________
From: SeqFan [seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] on behalf of Alonso Del Arte [alonso.delarte at gmail.com]
Sent: 31 January 2014 07:47
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
Subject: [seqfan] Re: An idea of sequences connected with OEIS

Maybe they will not be, but they have been in the past. Two favorites are
A053873 and A053169. See also Neil's paper "My favorite integer sequences."

Al


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 10:43 PM, Michael Porter <michael_b_porter at yahoo.com
> wrote:

>
> In addition, the A-numbers of sequences are subject to change, and any
> change would also alter your proposed sequences.  To be frank, I don't
> think sequences that have anything to do with the A-numbers will get
> approved.
>
> That doesn't mean it's not interesting to think about, though.  But
> wouldn't the existence of A000004, the all-zero sequence, make all of your
> sequences all-zero?
>
> - Michael
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> ________________________________
>  From: Andrew Weimholt <andrew.weimholt at gmail.com>
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
> Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:52 PM
> Subject: [seqfan] Re: An idea of sequences connected with OEIS
>
>
> This would not be well defined, as there are many sequences in the first
> sequence with as of yet unknown terms.
> Discovering a new term to one of these sequences would alter your proposed
> sequence.
>
>
> On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Vladimir Shevelev <shevelev at bgu.ac.il
> >wrote:
>
> > Under "OEIS-10000" I mean the first 10000 OEIS sequences with absolute
> > values of terms. Under sequence "OEIS-10000" I mean sequence
> > {a(0),a(1),a(2),...} such that
> > a(n) is the smallest number which not appears in position n in any
> > sequence in OEIS-10000.
> > Further we can consider sequences "OEIS-20000", "OEIS-30000", ...,
> > "OEIS-230000". It is very interesting to look how the sequence
> >  "OEIS-X0000"
> > changes depending on X>=1.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Vladimir
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>



--
Alonso del Arte
Author at SmashWords.com<https://www.smashwords.com/profile/view/AlonsoDelarte>
Musician at ReverbNation.com <http://www.reverbnation.com/alonsodelarte>

_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/