[seqfan] Re: An idea of sequences connected with OEIS

[Michael Porter]

In addition, the A-numbers of sequences are subject to change, and any change would also alter your proposed sequences.  To be frank, I don't think sequences that have anything to do with the A-numbers will get approved.

That doesn't mean it's not interesting to think about, though.  But wouldn't the existence of A000004, the all-zero sequence, make all of your sequences all-zero?

- Michael








________________________________
 From: Andrew Weimholt <andrew.weimholt at gmail.com>
To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu> 
Sent: Thursday, January 30, 2014 3:52 PM
Subject: [seqfan] Re: An idea of sequences connected with OEIS
 

This would not be well defined, as there are many sequences in the first
sequence with as of yet unknown terms.
Discovering a new term to one of these sequences would alter your proposed
sequence.


On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:20 AM, Vladimir Shevelev <shevelev at bgu.ac.il>wrote:

> Under "OEIS-10000" I mean the first 10000 OEIS sequences with absolute
> values of terms. Under sequence "OEIS-10000" I mean sequence
> {a(0),a(1),a(2),...} such that
> a(n) is the smallest number which not appears in position n in any
> sequence in OEIS-10000.
> Further we can consider sequences "OEIS-20000", "OEIS-30000", ...,
> "OEIS-230000". It is very interesting to look how the sequence
>  "OEIS-X0000"
> changes depending on X>=1.
>
> Best regards,
> Vladimir
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/

>

_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/