[seqfan] Re: Pi in Pi (with a "divide sign")

[Hans Havermann]

Eric Angelini:

> d) 3141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208/998628034825342117067982148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938=3.1459...


You need 78 (not 93) digits in the denominator.


Charles Greathouse:

> I like that the start of the second block of successive
> improvements is a supersequence of the location of the largest block of
> consecutive 9s seen so far -- sort of adds more detail to A048940.

Eric's improvements can be had not just at 99.. but also at 100.. locations. For example, the first 13310435 digits divided by the next 13310435 digits is the subsequent improvement over the first 1722776 digits divided by the next 1722775 digits.