[seqfan] Re: Question on base keyword

[Charles Greathouse]

Definitely base. Some sequences are borderline, but this one's pretty
clearly in the base court.

I try to keep information of this sort at
https://oeis.org/wiki/User:Charles_R_Greathouse_IV/Keywords
for reference, though perhaps more clarification on this particular case
would be in order.

Charles Greathouse
Analyst/Programmer
Case Western Reserve University


On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Neil Sloane <njasloane at gmail.com> wrote:

> Yes, I agree it is base
>
> I added the keyword!
>
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 28, 2014 at 4:19 PM, <franktaw at netscape.net> wrote:
>
> > There are a fair number of pairs of sequences like A106456 and A106455,
> > where the first sequence contains patterns of 0's and 1's, and the second
> > interprets them as binary numbers and converts them to decimal.
> >
> > It is pretty clear to me that the first of such pairs should  have the
> > "base"keyword; even by the original narrow definition of the keyword.
> These
> > would be different numbers (although the same numerals) in some other
> base.
> >
> > I'm not as certain about the second. By my definition, they should: at
> > some point in their definition, they treat numbers as numerals. I don't
> > want to go ahead and submit lots of changes for these without a
> consensus,
> > however.
> >
> > So, do people think A106455 and its ilk should or should not have the
> > "base" keyword?
> >
> > Franklin T. Adams-Watters
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Dear Friends, I have now retired from AT&T. New coordinates:
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>