[seqfan] Re: Numbers such that the n-th and (n+1)st terms are the successors of prime numbers and primes themselves and n+1 > n

[Bob Selcoe]

The title seems to say that the sequence should include only prime numbers - 
might it at least be best to delete the 51??

Cheers,
Bob Selcoe

--------------------------------------------------
From: "Neil Sloane" <njasloane at gmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:50 PM
To: "Sequence Fanatics Discussion list" <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Subject: [seqfan] Re: Numbers such that the n-th and (n+1)st terms are the 
successors of prime numbers and primes themselves and n+1 > n

> That one (A147513) is certainly a mess.  If no one has a better idea, 
> let's
> leave the terms intact, but give it keywords uned,obsc,unkn !
>
> Best regards
> Neil
>
> Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
> 11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
> Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
> Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
> Email: njasloane at gmail.com
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 25, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Charles Greathouse <
> charles.greathouse at case.edu> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone understand the definition of A147513? The terms start
>> 3, 5, 7, 11, 13, 19, 23, 31, 37, 47, 51
>> and no other information is given.
>>
>> Charles Greathouse
>> Analyst/Programmer
>> Case Western Reserve University
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>>
>> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>