[seqfan] Re: A235466
franktaw at netscape.net
Thu Oct 9 22:59:39 CEST 2014
No. 1011 in base 2 is 11, not 19, exactly as Harvey said. 19 is 10011
in base 2.
Franklin T. Adams-Watters
From: Ray Chandler <rayjchandler at sbcglobal.net>
To: 'Sequence Fanatics Discussion list' <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Thu, Oct 9, 2014 3:41 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A235466
739 is prime and is 1011 in base 9. 1011 in base 2 is 19 also prime.
So 739 is
in the sequence.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of
> P. Dale
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 3:19 PM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] A235466
> There seems to be something wrong with the above sequence.
> implement the definition, I get lots of terms that don't appear in
> sequence. In addition, even the example seems wrong, since 1011 in
> is 11, not 19. Am I misunderstanding something?
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
More information about the SeqFan