[seqfan] Re: A235466

[Frank Adams-Watters]

No. 1011 in base 2 is 11, not 19, exactly as Harvey said. 19 is 10011 
in base 2.

Franklin T. Adams-Watters

-----Original Message-----
From: Ray Chandler <rayjchandler at sbcglobal.net>
To: 'Sequence Fanatics Discussion list' <seqfan at list.seqfan.eu>
Sent: Thu, Oct 9, 2014 3:41 pm
Subject: [seqfan] Re: A235466


739 is prime and is 1011 in base 9.  1011 in base 2 is 19 also prime.  
So 739 is
in the sequence.
Ray

> -----Original Message-----
> From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of 
Harvey
> P. Dale
> Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 3:19 PM
> To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> Subject: [seqfan] A235466
>
>           There seems to be something wrong with the above sequence.  
When I
> implement the definition, I get lots of terms that don't appear in 
the online
> sequence.  In addition, even the example seems wrong, since 1011 in 
base 2
> is 11, not 19.  Am I misunderstanding something?
>           Best,
>           Harvey
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/


_______________________________________________

Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/