[seqfan] Re: A235466

[Allan Wechsler]

1011 in base 2 is not 19. It's 11, which is prime, so 739 is still in the
sequence. But the entry text is wrong to say "19".


On Thu, Oct 9, 2014 at 4:40 PM, Ray Chandler <rayjchandler at sbcglobal.net>
wrote:

> 739 is prime and is 1011 in base 9.  1011 in base 2 is 19 also prime.  So
> 739 is in the sequence.
> Ray
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: SeqFan [mailto:seqfan-bounces at list.seqfan.eu] On Behalf Of Harvey
> > P. Dale
> > Sent: Thursday, October 09, 2014 3:19 PM
> > To: Sequence Fanatics Discussion list
> > Subject: [seqfan] A235466
> >
> >           There seems to be something wrong with the above sequence.
> When I
> > implement the definition, I get lots of terms that don't appear in the
> online
> > sequence.  In addition, even the example seems wrong, since 1011 in base
> 2
> > is 11, not 19.  Am I misunderstanding something?
> >           Best,
> >           Harvey
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> >
> > Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>