[seqfan] Re: TREE sequence

[Neil Sloane]

No, not we could only show the terms 1 and 3

But there is a section in the Index dealing
with "Sequences which grow too fast to have
their own entry" (or something like that).
You could mention it there. What I have done
with others like it is to mention the sequence as a comment in
another sequence and refer to the latter in the Index entry.

Best regards
Neil

Neil J. A. Sloane, President, OEIS Foundation.
11 South Adelaide Avenue, Highland Park, NJ 08904, USA.
Also Visiting Scientist, Math. Dept., Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ.
Phone: 732 828 6098; home page: http://NeilSloane.com
Email: njasloane at gmail.com


On Mon, Oct 20, 2014 at 7:04 AM, Felix Fröhlich <felix.froe at googlemail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I have a sequence which I think is not yet in the OEIS, but where I am not
> sure whether I should submit it or not. The sequence is called 'TREE
> sequence' (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kruskal%27s_tree_theorem) and
> begins 1, 3. The next term is too large to include in the database, being
> larger than Graham's number.
>
> Should I submit this sequence?
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Felix
>
> _______________________________________________
>
> Seqfan Mailing list - http://list.seqfan.eu/
>